![]() ![]() The differences come in with the direct-injection turbocharged engine available only on Outback's Onyx XT, Limited XT, Touring XT, and Wilderness trims. In fact, their estimated fuel economy is almost the same, with Forester reaching up to 33 MPG** highway and 26 MPG city and the Outback getting up to 32 MPG highway and 26 MPG city with the standard engine. Every SUBARU BOXER engine is built with a unique horizontal layout, giving both vehicles a lower center of gravity and a finely tuned balance between power and fuel efficiency. Conversely, the Forester, with its taller, slightly more nimble body style, may make parallel parking in crowded city streets easier, and retailers report that some buyers appreciate the higher driver position of a more standard compact SUV.īoth the Outback and the Forester use the time- and trail-tested SUBARU BOXER ® engine to power their standard all-wheel drive systems. This gives it a longer, more drawn-out shape, with up to 191.9 inches of length, up to 66.9 inches of height (including roof rails), and up to 74.6 inches of width – 2 inches more than the Forester.ĭue to its longer wheelbase, lower height, and more substantial weight, driving the Outback could feel smoother over rough roads and trails compared to the Forester. The Outback, with its longer body shape and wheelbase, is a midsize crossover designed for smooth, controlled handling. However, the Forester has a boxier shape and is about 2 inches taller than the Outback, with a height of up to 68.9 inches. The Forester is a compact crossover, which gives it a small SUV silhouette with up to 72.2 inches of width and 182.7 inches of length – about 9 inches fewer than the Outback. ![]() The biggest differences between the Outback and Forester are their shapes, sizes, and classifications. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |